journal articles
VALIDITY OF ONLINE VERSUS IN-CLINIC SELF-REPORTED EVERYDAY COGNITION SCALE
T. Howell, J. Neuhaus, M.M. Glymour, M.W. Weiner, R.L Nosheny
J Prev Alz Dis 2022;2(9):269-276
BACKGROUND: Online cognitive assessments are alternatives to in-clinic assessments.
Objectives: We evaluated the relationship between online and in-clinic self-reported Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog).
Methods: In 94 Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Brain Health Registry (ADNI-BHR) participants, we estimated associations between online and in-clinic Everyday Cognition using Bland-Altman plots and regression. In 472 ADNI participants, we estimated reliability of in-clinic Everyday Cognition completed six months apart using Bland-Altman plots and regression.
Results: Online Everyday Cognition associations: Mean difference was 0.11 (95% limits of agreement: -0.41 to 0.64). In-clinic Everyday Cognition score increased by 0.81 for each online Everyday Cognition score unit increase (R2=0.60). In-clinic Everyday Cognition reliability: Mean difference was 0.01 (95% limits of agreement: -0.61 to 0.62). In-clinic Everyday Cognition score at enrollment increased by 0.79 for each in-clinic Everyday Cognition score unit increase at six months (R2=0.61).
Conclusion: Online Everyday Cognition closely corresponded with in-clinic Everyday Cognition, supporting validity of using online cognitive assessments to more efficiently facilitate Alzheimer’s disease research.
CITATION:
T. Howell ; J. Neuhaus ; M.M. Glymour ; M.W. Weiner ; R.L Nosheny (2022): Validity of Online Versus In-Clinic Self-Reported Everyday Cognition Scale. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease (JPAD). http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2022.19